I am glad that the United States is no longer a land of laws. I am glad that we have legalized the use of marijuana and that we are slowly realizing that the criminal justice system has not progressed as quickly as we’d hoped. I am glad that it is no longer illegal to drive while under the influence of a controlled substance, but I am glad that I am alive.
At first glance, it might seem like an odd choice of words. “Criminal Law” seems to imply that we are dealing with a crime, and that we have a system in place for dealing with it. But it is actually just the best way to describe what we have today’s criminal justice system. We have no longer the need for a separate system. We have a way of dealing with people who commit crimes, whether they be minor or major.
In the state of Michigan we have a very specific system called the “Municipal Court”. It is a court that deals with misdemeanors and low/no-bill offenses. In this particular system, anyone who is not a registered student can be charged with a misdemeanor, and only the court can determine if they are. If they are, they are not charged with a class 2 misdemeanor.
This system is a lot like a court system in our country. We have a separate system for minor crimes, but that system has never been implemented. Our current system of municipal court, the Court of Common Pleas, is the system that currently deals with misdemeanors and lowno-bill offenses. The way we deal with these offenses is very different.
In the movie, the court system deals with a lot of different things, but the two main issues dealt with are the definition of the crime and who the victim is. In our current system, the victim is the person who is harmed. If you’ve been hurt, you have the right to seek help, and the court has only a limited amount of time to deal with it.
The film features four cases of this nature. Case One is about a man who was arrested for having his wife murdered. The trial court judges the jury based on the victim’s age, and they decide that he should be sentenced to a life term, instead of a 25-year term. The court also decides that the victim’s family should be compensated. Case Two is about a man who was beaten to death by three thugs who had apparently gotten bored with their work.
Case One and Two are not the only ones to involve crimes against women. In many states, the death penalty is available for these crimes as well. The trial courts seem to have a pretty good handle on the situation, and the jury seems to have a pretty good handle on the situation too. They are deciding the sentence based on whether the defendant’s crimes were cold-blooded or not.
The problem is that the law, and the case itself, is not based on the facts of the crime, but of the defense. The defendants attorneys may have an excellent case, but the prosecutors may have a bad one. At the trial court level, the prosecution has to make the case stick. And stick it has to do. The prosecution has to show that the crime was not cold-blooded and that the defendant is not a threat to society.
The fact that we now have more than one trial court judge in the US is a problem. When the government of a country has two or more judges, the legal system can become a disaster. The problem with this is not that there is a problem with the judges. The problem is that the judges are chosen by the people, who are not on the same page. So when the government of a country has a bad judge, the whole legal system crumbles.
The film shows that the government of a country can not always be trusted, because it can have bad judges. When we look at the US, we see that it is a country with a lot of problems with legal and judicial systems. With one of the judges in the film named “Judge Thug”, we see that the government of the country may have made a bad choice. He was a person who knew what he was doing, so he tried to use the system to help his own cause.